Oh **** you Kansas`

[DinoDoc]

This is basically how the Democratic Party treats the occupy people.

If only.

[Elok]

Not PETA. Occupy Wall Street.

IIRC, even the Democrats weren't Quixotic enough to align themselves with those goofballs. Who did?

[DinoDoc]

IIRC, even the Democrats weren't Quixotic enough to align themselves with those goofballs. Who did?

“The most important thing we can do right now is those of us in leadership letting people know that we understand their struggles and we are on their side, and that we want to set up a system in which hard work, responsibility, doing what you’re supposed to do, is rewarded,” Obama tells ABC News. “And that people who are irresponsible, who are reckless, who don’t feel a sense of obligation to their communities and their companies and their workers that those folks aren’t rewarded.”

Congressional Democrats embrace Occupy Wall Street

[Sava]

If only.

If only what?

Are you stupid?

How about look at every major city run by Democrats and their response to the occupy protests.

Here's just Chicago:

At least one of the affidavits submitted by Thomas Durkin, a lead attorney for the defendants, suggested that. As Durkin argued:

"This was Mayor Rahm Emanuel being Mr Tough Guy to show the world that they can come for G8 and Nato. It's as simple as that. There was no need to make mass arrests on this night. There was no need to show Mr Tough Guy. It was a show of force. It was stupid."

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/16/occupy-chicago-arrests-rahm-emanuels-dry-run

Emanuel was Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairman, Chief of Staff to Obama... the list goes on...

It doesn't get more "Democratic leadership" than him.

[Sava]

Congressional Democrats embrace Occupy Wall Street

Oh I get it. You can't tell the difference between pandering and real life.

Got it.

[Kidlicious]

The one difference between the two sides is that liberals ardently disavow their nutcases. The right embraces them.

And also, the number of nutbags on the right far exceeds the liberals. To equate the two in any way whatsoever is simply stupid and disingenuous.

Bull****. There's a crap load of liberal extremist nutbags. You're one of them. But there are many more extreme than you who you actually admire. You will only throw them under the train when called on it.

[kentonio]

I meant "coat hanger" as a briefer byword for "an era when massive numbers of women died from unsafe illegal abortions." Easier to type.

I assume then you also have figures for the number of women sexually and financially exploited and blackmailed by illegal abortion providers once they had engaged in an activity that could have resulted in their imprisonment or death? Or the ones who didn't go to hospital and didn't die, but just suffered horrible internal injuries that healed but prevented them ever enjoying sex or having children in future?

[Sava]

Bull****. There's a crap load of liberal extremist nutbags.

Agree. But they aren't a significant portion of Democratic voters.

You're one of them.

Nah, I'm just an internet troll.

But there are many more extreme than you who you actually admire.

Like who? Name one person I admire.

You will only throw them under the train when called on it.

If "when called on it" means "at every opportunity", then yes.



Don't you have a wife to beat? Oh yeah... well, maybe you can meet a nice woman who you can batter. Even Hitler had a girlfriend.

[Kidlicious]

I caught gribbler defending the radfem that said, "kill your fathers." Do you denounce her or not?

[Ban Kenobi]

You mean the radfem who never killed anyone...?

[Sava]

I caught gribbler defending the radfem that said, "kill your fathers." Do you denounce her or not?

In general, I denounce every single human being on the planet (including myself)... unless otherwise specified.

I can't spend my time singling out every stupid *******. If I spent only a second on a single individual and did so every second of the day for 100 years, I could only get to about a little over 3 billion.

[Kidlicious]

In general, I denounce every single human being on the planet (including myself)... unless otherwise specified.

I can't spend my time singling out every stupid *******. If I spent only a second on a single individual and did so every second of the day for 100 years, I could only get to about a little over 3 billion.

Dude, you're an extremist. Most feminists have at least the decency to disassociate themselves from that woman.

[Sava]

Dude, you're an extremist.

My views are consistently in agreement with the majority of American's views in almost every single issue (that I actually care about). So yeah... not an extremist.

Pro-tip: Normal people will seem like extremists to extremists... like say, "men's rights" advocates. Gender equality is a mainstream view. You are the extremist, not me... son.

I'm just an asshole. *******s are different from extremists. Most/many extremists are *******s. But just being an ******* doesn't make me an extremist.

[Kidlicious]

My views are consistently in agreement with the majority of American's views in almost every single issue (that I actually care about). So yeah... not an extremist.

Pro-tip: Normal people will seem like extremists to extremists... like say, "men's rights" advocates. Gender equality is a mainstream view. You are the extremist, not me... son.

I'm just an asshole. *******s are different from extremists. Most/many extremists are *******s. But just being an ******* doesn't make me an extremist.

Only 42% of americans identify with the democratic party. A majority of those are minorities. Any middle class whites like yourself are extremists.

And I'm the one who believes in gender equality. You've consistanty demonstated that you don't, for example saying people who have moustaches are woman beaters and child molezters.

[Sava]

Only 42% of americans identify with the democratic party.

Two things. One, what does that have to do with me?

Two, if 42% of the population agrees with or identifies with something, that kind of makes it "mainstream".

A majority of those are minorities. Any middle class whites like yourself are extremists.

I'm not a "middle class white". My household income is north of $250k. And other than the color of my skin (meaning, I'm less likely to get confused with a 'thug' and shot by some gun toting maniac), very little about my family's ethnicity is similar to the experience of most "white people".

And I'm the one who believes in gender equality.

Male supremacy is not equality.

saying people who have moustaches are woman beaters and child molezters.

Sorry if I was misunderstood. I'm really only talking about you.